Friday, February 26, 2010

The Safe Seed Pledge... Is It Really?


The Safe Seed Pledge…  Is It Really?

What is it? It is a voluntary pledge companies may take if they wish to be recognized by the consuming public as a company who sells non-Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) seeds.

It is maintained by the Council for Responsible Genetics and can be found here: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/Help/TakeAction.aspx

It looks like this:

The Safe Seed Pledge:

"Agriculture and seeds provide the basis upon which our lives depend. We must protect this foundation as a safe and genetically stable source for future generations. For the benefit of all farmers, gardeners and consumers who want an alternative,
We pledge that we do not knowingly buy or sell genetically engineered seeds or plants.
The mechanical transfer of genetic material outside of natural reproductive methods and between genera, families or kingdoms, poses great biological risks as well as economic, political, and cultural threats. We feel that genetically engineered varieties have been insufficiently tested prior to public release. More research and testing is necessary to further assess the potential risks of genetically engineered seeds. Further, we wish to support agricultural progress that leads to healthier soils, genetically diverse agricultural ecosystems and ultimately healthy people and communities."

Wow, that seems like a great thing! The website even lists companies that have taken the pledge! This is sooo cool!

Back up a second…

Read that pledge again:

“We pledge that we do not knowingly buy or sell genetically engineered seeds or plants.”

“…not knowingly…”  sounds suspiciously like a very large loop-hole.

So in theory, a company can sell GMO crops to the home gardener and declare, “Oops, sorry, I didn’t realize it was GMO. My bad,” with no repercussions.

An underlying assumption in the pledge is that the consumer is being protected from companies who would not “…wish to support agricultural progress that leads to healthier soils, genetically diverse agricultural ecosystems and ultimately healthy people and communities…” and yet the pledge allows some of the most questionable and seemingly corrupt agricultural corporations such as Monsanto to parade their products in the catalogs of the ‘ethical’ companies on the list. True, the seeds carried may not actually be GMO, but they are from a company that believes agricultural progress includes ever increasing doses of toxic chemicals applied to vast monoculture ecosystems that indebt, bankrupt, and destroy the health and livelihoods of people and communities sold on hopes of higher yields, for the goal of increasing profit margins. Ethical?

“They” have snuck right in and are selling their goods here in the midst of those taking the higher ethical ground. How? Where?

Enter Seminis, a global seed conglomerate owned by Monsanto that supplies 40% of the vegetable seeds to home gardeners by supplying mail order seed companies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto#Spin-offs_and_mergers

Let’s take a quick look at the list of companies that have taken the Safe Seed Pledge.


John Scheepers Kitchen Garden Seeds:

Pumpkin=Spooktacular http://www.kitchengardenseeds.com/cgi-bin/catview.cgi?_fn=Product&_category=28 displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/pumpkin.asp

Tomato=Big Beef http://www.kitchengardenseeds.com/cgi-bin/catview.cgi?_fn=Product&_category=170 displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/fresh_market_tomatoes.asp


Johnny’s Selected Seeds

Onion=Sierra Blanca http://www.johnnyseeds.com/p-7772-sierra-blanca-f1.aspx displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/onion.asp

Tomato=Celebrity http://www.johnnyseeds.com/p-7952-celebrity-f1.aspx displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/fresh_market_tomatoes.asp


New England Seed Company

Tomato=Celebrity http://www.neseed.com/Tomato_i_Celebrity_Hybrid_i_p/33000.htm displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/fresh_market_tomatoes.asp

Tomato=Big Beef http://www.neseed.com/Tomato_i_Big_Beef_Hybrid_i_p/32930.htm displayed in Seminis listing: http://us.seminis.com/products/fresh_market_tomatoes.asp

These three companies are just an example of what I found with a quick scroll through the list of companies who have taken the Safe Seed Pledge. They may not be selling GMO seeds, but if they were truly wishing to “…support agricultural progress that leads to healthier soils, genetically diverse agricultural ecosystems and ultimately healthy people and communities…” they certainly are NOT showing it in their own business models.
Research the seed company you are buying from. Demand that they actually support the qualities that are important to you. Demand that they hold true to their pledge. Anything less and the pledge is merely the act of a sneaky company jumping onto an unregulated bandwagon for the sole purpose of misleading the customer with warm and fuzzy, but false, portrayals for the purpose of making a dollar.

Demand more.

It’s your dollar.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

New Dehli - What, exactly, is your GMO stand?

Okay, this is an interesting one. I can't tell if it is good or bad. As near as I can tell, India is anti-Monsanto but seemingly pro-GMO.  Haven't run across that combination before!  All for down with Monsanto, but what is the Indian government capable of doing with an arsenal of GMO's?  Or maybe I just read it all wrong. It was a rather taxing read.

Here is the article in full: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/commanding-heights-return/386315/
Below is an excerpt with my own thoughts in red. Believe me, without annotating this article I was having a difficult time deciphering what was being said!

*********************
The same bias in favour of the public sector (ie. gov't operated) was also seen when, in the Bt brinjal case, the government gave an impression that the results of the tests could not be trusted as they had been conducted by private sector firms. Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh may have gone by the book as he put a moratorium on the commercial use of the Bt seeds after contacting different scientists and stakeholders. But his focus on creating a “countervailing power” to the work done by Monsanto was jarring (jarring to Monsanto being the private sector?) as was his comment on the number of “Indian-origin scientists” who work in Monsanto (as if this made the science better or worse). Indeed, Mr Ramesh’s idea of “countervailing power” was not about setting up more private firms since he rued the lack of a ‘large-scale publicly-funded biotechnology effort in agriculture’. (So he want's more gov't control of the testing and R&D, yes? Not really anti-GMO, but sounds anti-Monsanto by default.)

A couple of recent bills of the government reinforce this view (reinforcing the confusion? the pro-GMO stance of this paragraph? or the anti-Monsanto stance in the previous paragraph?) The Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill, for instance, has a section on misleading the public about organisms and products and the punishment for those found guilty of this charge is a jail term of six months to a year. Theoretically, anyone who speaks against genetically modified products can be imprisoned for misleading the public (huge, depressing step backwards;) there are even prison terms for those demonstrating against such products. Little wonder that the scientific community is up in arms against the proposal (thank god somebody has their head screwed on right.) The Right to Education Act, as has been pointed out before, is also flawed since, instead of focusing on educational outcomes, it focuses on infrastructure standards. This will likely drive out most unrecognised private schools that, as several studies have shown, offer education levels that are no worse (though often better) than those offered by government schools, and at costs that are much lower. While the move towards “commanding heights” is questionable, what makes this unacceptable is that those in charge of these heights are not doing much to ensure their better functioning. Witness, for instance, the delays and the confusion over the BSNL tender, and this is just one of the recent examples. (Wow, the content in this article is plain-old creepy.)
*********************

So, did I get it wrong? What are your thoughts?

Monsanto Faking Data To Get Approvals. (Now there's a shocker!)

Barbara H. Peterson on February 14th, 2010
India is leading the way in exposing Monsanto for what it is – corrupt to the core. The following two articles show how Monsanto regularly faked data to get its transgenic crop varieties approved in India...


Entire article: http://farmwars.info/?p=2407

This Farm Wars blog looks like a good reference for those fighting the good fight again Monsanto and bioterrorism. Give it a look.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

10 Things you should know about RoundUp Ready Alfalfa

(and as a side note, have you noticed the massive advertising propaganda surrounding GMO's and "feeding the world"?)

Original detailed text in .pdf format:
http://www.worc.org/userfiles/10%20Things%20You%20Should%20Know%20about%20RR%20Alfalfa%202-06.pdf


Ready-to-use message to USDA to speak out against Monsanto's Round-up Ready Alfalfa:
http://action.freshthemovie.com/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1753


1. Roundup Ready alfalfa will contaminate organic and other non-GM alfalfa seed and hay.

2. Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase the cost of organic milk and beef.


3. Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase herbicide use.

4. Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase the potential for glyphosate (Roundup) resistant weeds.

5. Monsanto’s patents on Roundup Ready technology transfer unfair liability risks to farmers.

6. Roundup Ready alfalfa will ruin the hay export market forPacific Northwest growers.

7. Roundup Ready alfalfa threatens the honey industry.

8. The potential effects of Roundup Ready alfalfa feed on the health and productivity of livestock and wildlife have not been analyzed by independent scientists.

9. Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase farmers’ seed and chemical costs.

10. Roundup Ready alfalfa increases the level of corporate control over American agriculture, and further reduces the availability of public alfalfa seed varieties.


Ready-to-use message to USDA to speak out against Monsanto's Round-up Ready Alfalfa:
http://action.freshthemovie.com/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1753